Re: arma che si inceppa
Dice un esperto vero (Chuck Hawks):
Is the Benelli system reliable? The answer is yes and no. Like the A-5, it requires a firm shoulder mount to recoil against, something that gas systems do not need. Like limp-wristing an automatic pistol, the lack of a firm mount can cause problems. A good comparison is to the mechanical versus recoil-set (or inertia) single triggers in a double-barreled shotgun. One can be as good as the other in a practical sense, until the application turns to the 28 gauge and .410 bore. In those cases, there is often insufficient jolt to cycle the triggers from barrel to barrel. Mechanical triggers remain the preferred approach in small gauge guns for that very reason.
The bolt (bold body) of a Benelli does not slam home with the authority of an A-5 or most gas guns. It is a fairly soft return, for a reason. The recoil spring (return spring) has to be weak in comparison to the little bolt-head spring that shoots the bolt back in the first place. If it were not, the bolt would not reliably come back with enough vigor to eject the empty hull and recock the gun. With an A-5, adding weight to the barrel can impair function--sluggish barrel movement--and you may have reliability problems. In the case of the Benelli, adding weight to the gun can do the same thing. Soft, sluggish rearward movement during firing and the bolt body may not be able to fully compress the bolt head, or inertia spring. Light loads may also result in unreliable function for the same reason.
nika ha scritto:ti posso garantire ke con il mio benelli ci faccio la guerra a caccia , e nn l'ho pulisco mai , se piove gli do solo una pennellata di disel sulla canna x nn fargli fare riggine , x il resto sparo dai 22gr ai 36 gr dalle brennek alle gualandi senza mai avuto un problema . poi se facciamo sport sparo senza appoggire alla spalla senza problemi .
il sistema inerziale nn viene usato x le armi da guerra xke nn è appropiato x il tipo di munizioni . la testina rotante alle alte pressioni di una carabina sgangia in ritardo di conseguenza puo provocare inceppamenti e nn permette una velocita di raffica con quel tipo di munizione . tante ke è stato aggiormato è migliorato con il sistema argo ( COPIATO TRA L'ALTRO DALLA REMINTOG ) come ben saprai . Ma da qui a dire ke la benelli nn è affidabbile c'è ne vuole ... ATTUALMENTE è IL FUCILE PIU AFFIDABBILE E VENDUTO AL MONDO . ultimamente supera anke la beretta poike di recupero gas c'e ne sono una caterba piu o meno tutti uguali , mentre ki vuole andare sul sicuro scegli BENELLI ...
Dice un esperto vero (Chuck Hawks):
Is the Benelli system reliable? The answer is yes and no. Like the A-5, it requires a firm shoulder mount to recoil against, something that gas systems do not need. Like limp-wristing an automatic pistol, the lack of a firm mount can cause problems. A good comparison is to the mechanical versus recoil-set (or inertia) single triggers in a double-barreled shotgun. One can be as good as the other in a practical sense, until the application turns to the 28 gauge and .410 bore. In those cases, there is often insufficient jolt to cycle the triggers from barrel to barrel. Mechanical triggers remain the preferred approach in small gauge guns for that very reason.
The bolt (bold body) of a Benelli does not slam home with the authority of an A-5 or most gas guns. It is a fairly soft return, for a reason. The recoil spring (return spring) has to be weak in comparison to the little bolt-head spring that shoots the bolt back in the first place. If it were not, the bolt would not reliably come back with enough vigor to eject the empty hull and recock the gun. With an A-5, adding weight to the barrel can impair function--sluggish barrel movement--and you may have reliability problems. In the case of the Benelli, adding weight to the gun can do the same thing. Soft, sluggish rearward movement during firing and the bolt body may not be able to fully compress the bolt head, or inertia spring. Light loads may also result in unreliable function for the same reason.